Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 12:20

Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Nothing Phone (3) camera, battery and charging specs spill in new leak - Notebookcheck
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
2 dead in Las Vegas Strip shooting, with suspect known but not yet arrested, police say - ABC News
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
"Remarkable" Pattern Discovered Behind Prime Numbers, Math's Most Unpredictable Objects - IFLScience
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why do philosophy of physics when you can do physics itself? - Aeon
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
How do you treat a hematoma at home?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?